![]() Theorists in the nineteenth century discussed the best way to meet the gambit. The Queen’s Gambit is one of the oldest openings, first mentioned in the Göttingen manuscript of 1490, then later the subject of analyses by Salvio and Greco in the early seventeenth century. ![]() There is also a stark difference from the King’s Gambit in that the white king’s safety is not compromised by the pawn advances on the left hand side of the board. However the “gambit” in the opening’s name is rather a misnomer as Black cannot really hold on to the pawn. The offer of a pawn with 2 c4 is what gives the opening its edge, as the c-pawn attacks Black’s central strongpoint. The Queen’s Gambit takes the game to a strategic battle where the tactical clashes are delayed until the middlegame. The character of the game differs greatly from that of king pawn openings, which often quickly result in open clashes. The Queen’s Gambit (1 d4 d5 2 c4) is the keystone to an offensive plan by White on the left hand side of the board. The next few moves are all about exerting pressure on the centre of the board.’īelow we take a closer look at both the Queen’s Gambit Declined and the Queen’s Gambit Accepted – extracted from the show’s protagonist Beth Harmon’s favourite book Modern Chess Openings. ![]() Therefore, the most popular and solid reply is 2 … e6 (The Queen’s Gambit Declined). But some players feel uncomfortable allowing their opponents an obvious advantage in space. Marsh explains that ‘after 2 … dxc4 (the Queens Gambit Accepted) White can either rush to occupy the centre with his pawns – 3 e4 – or develop more methodically and occupy a little later.’ He also points out that ‘there is nothing wrong with playing the Black side of the Queen’s Gambit Accepted. The move can either be accepted by Black taking the pawn (dxc4) or declined. Or as Sean Marsh puts it in Batsford’s Chess Bible ‘White is offering a temporary pawn sacrifice to try to tempt Black into giving up the centre.’ The Queen’s Gambit (1 d4 d5 2 c4) is an opening strategy by White to try and occupy the centre of the board. In this blog post, we explain the opening move that inspired the name of the book and TV series. Online chess playing site reported a five-fold increase of daily sign-ups to the site following the show’s release and Washington Post wrote that ‘The pandemic sparked an interest in chess. Wait until material is fairly equal before you try for a mating attack.If the Queen’s Gambit TV-series has got you inspired to play chess, you’re not alone. ![]() Playing like this you will probably win some material about once in every ten moves. You are correct that he will not make good plans. Keep central control and identify important squares. And it still is an English without your Queen. Set up an unfamiliar situation in the opening. You may just force him to make good moves. Keep things closed, but retain the option to open them up.ĭont set up direct threats unless they are well hidden or unstoppable. Pieces out in the middle get exchanged off. If it happens it happens, but dont set your sights on it.ĭone even go for active development. Here is some advice based on that, although your own list is already pretty good.ĭont go for a briliancy. In our tournaments the odds-givers did surprisingly well. Had you and your friend been members, I think you would have played at Queen odds, or maybe Rook plus time handicap. Years ago my club in England ran a handicap tournament in the summer, which I organised and also played in. In which variant of the english opening is it difficult for a beginner to exploit a queen? What should be my strategy for that game? / How can I prepare for that game? Ideally I would like to go for opposite castling with a pawns attack. I would rather go for c4, which is my standard opening. However, I don't want to go into e4, since he knows that opening to a certain extent. When I play without a rook odds, I try to keep the lines closed or to play with white a really aggressive e4, f4. He didn't make big blunders and he played the opening quite well (e4, developed both knights and the white bishop and sacrificed on f7 for my 2nd rook), but he got lost in the middle game and did not know what to do.ġ) He knows that he wants to exchange as many pieces as possible even with slight material costs.Ģ) He knows how to play the standard textbook e4 - e5 opening, but I guess he is not familiar with other openings.ģ) He didn't make huge blunders, so I cannot expect to sacrifice pieces and win in the opening phase.Ĥ) The middle and endgame should be the parts of the game where he is less experienced.ĥ) I expect him to be weak in tactics and to loose pawns in not-obvious situations. Today I played with the black pieces with a rook odds and I won. My Elo rating is about 2000-2100, my friend's should be around 1400. I made a bet with a non-neglegible stake that I will win a game against a friend without queen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |